Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Friday, February 5, 2016

Jammin' with my Ukulele

Ah, retirement! Once you get over feeling guilty, you have time to do a lot of things you just didn't get to while you were working. My plan was to focus on photography and I have (check out the new website  http://www.nearlylostphotography.com/ and the 365 Photo Challenge Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/365photochallenge2016/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel ). But a strange thing happened while I was scanning the local adult ed winter/spring course catalogue for photography related courses. There weren't any but just before I tossed it into the recycling bin, I saw "The Joy of Uke". Hmm. Of course, I registered and three days before the class started UPS delivered my new ukulele. As I held that little Chinese-made, stringed instrument tenderly in my hands, I saw my whole tortured music lesson history flash before my eyes. 


The saga began many decades ago when my aunt offered my mother my cousin Sandra's old clarinet. When asked if I would like to play, I saw a marching band uniform and fancy parades ahead and jumped at the chance. My dreams were shattered when the only available music teacher, our milkman, refused to take me on as a pupil because I was too young. No clarinet for me. But all was not lost since the possibility of becoming a piano virtuoso loomed the year we lived with my grandparents before our new house was available. My Aunt Mary's old piano was in the parlor and I was hooked once my grandfather taught me to play Chopsticks. Lessons were provided and I practiced diligently until, alas, we had to move into our new three bedroom 1960's ranch house in the suburbs. It had no parlor, so no piano for me. 

The next chapter in my musical memoir starts with the Beatles first appearance on the Ed Sullivan show. Yes, it was February 9th, 1964, and pop music was my new best friend. Who wouldn't want to play guitar like John, Paul, and George? I must have pestered my parents relentlessly because they bought me a little Silvertone from Sears and arranged for me to take lessons. Sadly, I can't remember my first guitar teacher's name but he had a 1950's wave in his hair and wore a fringed Grand Ole Opry style shirt. No mop top. No mod suit. No singing "All My Lovin'"or "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" for me. 

Still I was no quitter and for about three years I took my weekly lesson in a sad little room above a storefront downtown. My new music teacher introduced me to Mel Bay and his graded guitar method. Now I don't know if Mel Bay was ever in a band but my instructor played in a country western group. He must not have been a singer, though, because we never sang. Instead we worked our way through several grades of old Mel's system. I went from playing "The Merry Men" on the B string to cowboy songs, classical etudes and rousing ragtime tunes. I was a fancy little fingerpicker, but my dreams of rock stardom had faded away and died. Eventually, I just stopped going. 

Over the years since I have dabbled with guitars. I've taken a few more lessons and done a couple of workshops. There have been many starts and stops along the way. Nothing has ever really come together. Friends have occasionally invited me to jam with them, but that's always sounded so incredibly intimidating. I may have been able pick out "Valse Lente, op.33" but there's been no jamming for me. 

Fast forward to "The Joy of Uke" every Tuesday night in the brightly lit music room of the middle school. I sit with about 17 other eager students in front of our teacher who wears a silly Hawaiian shirt.  He calls us all musicians because we are tuning up, sight reading, and playing and singing together. The other night we worked through "I've Just Seen a Face" followed by "Hey, Good Lookin". Ironically, that's the Beatles meeting up with Hank Williams. Things are coming together nicely and I'm jammin'. 








Saturday, December 19, 2015

It's Time for Another 365 Challenge

I know I said in the last post that I needed to stop telling you what I'm doing with my time now that I'm not working. Well, let's make today an exception. Why? Because it's time for another 365 Day Photo Challenge! As some of you may know, we did one of these in 2014. You can see the results on Pinterest at https://www.pinterest.com/barbararicker/365-day-photo-challenge/  You can also look back at previous posts about it if you're so inclined. I'll include those links below.

Why take and share a picture a day every day for an entire year? My quick response would be "Hey, why not?" But some of you may need a bit more convincing so I'll start with this. We all have a camera with us most of the time. We all are living our lives in moments that flash by and are too quickly forgotten. Some of those moments are captured and shared on social media but most are not. Those moments are often lost, but they are special and deserve to be documented. I really believe that the folks who participated last time would agree but I'd love to hear your thoughts so leave a comment below and subscribe to the blog to follow along as we go.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Don't Over Customize

 So, yeah, I got a new iPad. We're quite rough on electronics here at the 127 and my old one had a cracked screen. (No, I did not drop it purposely when I heard he Air 2 was being released). For me getting a new device is not only exciting but a perfect opportunity to reorganize and to revisit app selections, blog subscriptions, and news feeds. I'm starting  fresh and only installing the things I really use. But while I'm purging and editing,  I'm also being reminded of what I perceive as a dangerous trend, over customizing. 

I can tell Facebook what I want to see and don't want to see. I can pick my news sources and blogs in Feedly. I can follow only the boards that interest me in Pinterest, make Twitter lists, and select specific Communities in Google+. That's great, right? Sure. In many respects these kinds of choices save us time and make our lives easier. I'm not inclined to read things that don't interest me so why should I bother to weed through them? Well, maybe, just maybe, I'm missing something important.

Remember magazines, anyone? Life, Look, Time, Newsweek? Did you ever read a daily newspaper? These were publications that gave us a little bit of everything. We were exposed to unfamiliar stories and issues and to opinions that differed from our own. Of course, we didn't read every article and editorial anymore than we open every single link today. But they were there for us if we wanted them often complete with pictures. Yes, pictures that we might not otherwise have seen. We were able to broaden our world view and prepare ourselves to be better Jeopardy players just by thumbing through the pages. 


The Internet gives us access to just about everything. It's amazing to me what I can see and discover here on the web. How expansive and mind-bogglingly broad it all is! I think we should embrace it and open ourselves up a little more. When we over customize we close ourselves in. We become too fixed and polarized. Have you been watching any of those horribly misleading and divisive political ads? Are you exclusively Fox News or MS NBC? Is it "my way or the highway" ? Perhaps your perspective has shrunk. Maybe you're over customizing. 


Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Hold your Camera Steady

I love Facebook. Well, actually that's overstating it a bitbut I like Facebook. I really do. Keeping up with friends, family and former students is enjoyable. Most people share good things. Many of my fb friends are quite witty and can usually make me smile. Some, of course, bare their souls by ranting angrily and/or inviting us to their latest pity party. Others politicize and proselytize ad nauseum. That's why being able to hide or block those overly annoying posters is handy and one of my favorite features.
But ranters and malcontents notwithstanding, can we talk about sharing photos? Can we focus (pardon the pun) on blurry, dark, and grainy shots? Why? Why do you do it, People? You have to stop. Just because you have a camera and you have cute kids, pets, boyfriends, girlfriends or what have you doesn't mean you have to share every shot. Yes, you took a picture of something cool. You captured a moment in time. It was precious. But if that image didn't come out right, you should delete it. Perhaps you attended an event, a very special event, a shareable event where great things things happened. If you snapped your shutter thirty times, maybe you should share your best five. It's called editing. Editing is a good thing. Let's all try to get better at editing, shall we?
    -There's a long, thoughtful pause here as I decide that I'm not even going to mention selfies.-
Now I know as I write this that I am as guilty as anyone of posting bad pictures. I really do take a lot of crappy photos. I always have and I admit that in the past I shared them. For this I apologize profusely. My dogs are adorable. The view out my back door is spectacular. I think I have a good eye for seeing things that would make a good photograph. However, more often than not  what I get on the screen is not what I saw in my head. Here's just one example.  My living room is very dark so cutesy dog pictures and videos don't come out well when taken there. Believe me I have tried and tried.  It's not the camera. (Well, perhaps if I had a Nikon D4, but I digress/fantasize). It's usually not the picture taker. It's the lighting.  Much as it pains me to miss those funny, one of a kind snapshots, I have stopped. I now realize that in most instances no photo is better than a bad photo.
So my advice to you is quite simple. Hold your camera steady. Look for good light. Think before you click the shutter. If your shot sucks, don't share it. Oh, and don't take pictures of anything you wouldn't want your grandmother to see. Now please excuse me while I go delete a bunch of my pictures. Yes, yes, I am sure I want to delete that one.


Wednesday, January 30, 2013

So What Does Barb Say?

Welcome to my new blog, So Barb Says. The name says it all. I really do have  lot to say and I want to say it here. My first blog, You Need a Helmet, has a specific point of view and that is to complain about the idiotic things that baffle and frustrate us as we go along. The description spells that out with "Think of me as your cranky aunt." But, hey, even though this may surprise some of you, I'm not always cranky.

There are many things that interest me now. I teach. I take pictures. I research the family tree. Should I blog about my work? Most days probably not. The boss may be reading. Should I create a photography blog? Well, I'm not behind my camera often enough. Besides I don't have the time for hours of editing and a lot of my pictures suck. Okay so, how about a genealogy blog? Nah, that's too narrow a topic and some days trying to clear up the mysteries of my family's distant past just gives me a headache. I need more flexibility but I can't commit to multiple accounts.

I also really enjoy posting on Facebook and Twitter. Most days I can muster up a status and/or a tweet or two. Some of them are even entertaining if I do say so myself. Should I try my hand at microblogging? That sounds like fun. Quick. To the point. Spit it out and you're done. But some things require more attention. Not everything can be so wittily or simply expressed. Again I need more flexibility and I hope to find it here..

This is my spot , my blogspot, where I can do any and all of the above. There's no specific point of view or focus. Like the rest of you, I just want to have my say. So what does Barb say today? Life is short, complicated and full of wonder. At 61 I am at a place where I feel I can look back and look ahead with what I view as a healthy perspective. Of course, I hope you'll subscribe so you can disagree with that very bold statement. I hope you'll  become a reader so you can comment and keep the conversations going.  I hope you'll stay tuned and I thank you  for listening.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

YouNeedaHelmet When Your Article Gets Old

Over three months ago my boss sent me an urgent email. He needed an article for a newsletter “right away, as in today”. I hate pressure as much as the next guy, so I was really annoyed (toned down language in case my mother reads this). However, I struggled to put something of quality together. As of yet, there has been no newsletter published and this article is growing older by the minute. Rather than let it die, I’m going to post it here.

Facebook and the Law

We all love facebook, right? We use it to keep in touch with family and friends. We post our statuses share our pictures, jokes and links. We chat and check in at our favorite locations. It’s great fun. However, our facebook profiles say a lot about us. How many of us think about how our information can be used by third parties? How much of our privacy are we risking by using facebook and other social networking sites?

Facebook is clearly a public forum, therefore all information published on the site is available to the general public and can be legally used in criminal or other investigations. This is obvious in a situation where a person claiming a permanent disability under worker’s compensation statute posts status updates and photos on his arduous Trek Across Maine ride. After the June 15, 2011 “Vancouver Riot” which broke out after our Bruins beat the Canucks in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals, police were overwhelmed with thousands of  email tips with links to facebook and other social media postings. Many of these have been used in the investigation and presumably will be introduced as evidence in subsequent prosecutions.

So, it’s a given that the police can and will use facebook, but what about the implications in civil cases particularly in the discovery process? Modern discovery rules are very broad allowing for discovery of just about anything that may lead to admissible evidence. In Offenback v. L.M. Bowman, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66432 (M.D. Pa. June 22, 2011) the plaintiff sued the defendants for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The damages complained of included inability to work and limited “ability to sit, walk, stand, ride in a vehicle, bend, stoop, push, pull, and lift. He claimed that he could not drive for any period of time and [was] physically limited as to riding his bicycle or motorcycle.” The defendant’s attorneys requested discovery of his facebook account. His attorneys claimed the information was not relevant.

During an in camera review here’s what the judge found the plaintiff’s facebook account revealed:

• Plaintiff has posted a number of photographs or updates that reflect he continues to ride motorcycles and may have on more than one occasion traveled via motorcycle between his home in Kentucky and Pennsylvania. In particular, our review found a photograph posted on March 14, 2011, which appears to show Plaintiff with a Harley Davidson motorcycle that other posts suggest that he purchased in or around July 2010.

• On or about October 1, 2010, Plaintiff posted information to his account that suggests he may have traveled to West Virginia via motorcycle.

• On July 22, 2010, a post on Plaintiff's "Profile" page suggests that he had taken, or was planning to take, a trip to Pennsylvania  on his motorcycle.

• On October 29, 2010, a photograph was posted to his account that may show Plaintiff hunting and in possession of a 10-point buck that he or another hunter had shot and killed.

• On August 29, 2010, Plaintiff's "Profile" contains an update in which he posts photographs and comments suggesting that he may have recently ridden a mule.

• On July 7, 2010, Plaintiff posted pictures of a Harley Davidson motorcycle that it appears he may have purchased shortly before the pictures were posted.

• On July 1, 2010, Plaintiff included "motorcycles" among his interests that he posted to his Facebook  profile.

• Between March 16, 2010, and March 18, 2010, friends or relatives of Plaintiff posted comments to his profile that suggest Plaintiff had traveled from Kentucky to Pennsylvania, either by motorcycle or automobile.

It should be no surprise that the plaintiff was ordered to provide that facebook data to the defendants although the judge did add that other information, specifically “routine communications with family and friends, an interest in bluegrass and country music, a photography hobby, sporadic observations about current events, and a passion for the Philadelphia Phillies”, was not relevant.